🚀 How to implement usage-based pricing?

DECODE Conference: Featuring Lightspeed, Roblox, Mithril, Higgsfield and more

Sign up for the conference to:

• Learn from intimate roundtables with speakers

• Join an invite-only dinner with founders

• Demo your product to investors

Apply to join the conference team:

• Meet and work with the DECODE board

• Deepen connections with founders, investors and C-suite execs

• Boost your reputation by engaging with high-profile speakers on LinkedIn

Use promo code: EARLYBIRD for a 30% discount

3 tactics to implement usage-based pricing

⚠️ Provide pricing options for flexibility

• AI usage varies across customers—some barely use it while others 10x volume overnight

• One-size-fits-all pricing model do not work

• Offer pricing models that let customers choose stability or flexibility:

  • Package AI features in fixed-price bundles that align with how customers buy today

  • Layer in usage tiers or credit systems that allow advanced customers to “graduate” into more flexible pricing

  • Let fixed-price packages coexist with usage models so customers can choose what works for them

🔎 Build pricing hypotheses

• Audit internal data (e.g. what sales reps discount most, which features get most traction, any usage patterns and clusters) 

• Perform competitive research to understand buyer psychology and pricing mechanics (e.g. Which features do your competitors highlight? How are AI features packaged or priced? What positioning are they using for usage-based options?)

• Rank areas of perceived value from customers—not “what would you pay,” but “what matters most (e.g. Which features are essential? Where needs investment or improvement? Why did they buy your product?)

• Draft 2-3 pricing hypotheses:

  • Consider how the current package is performing, what your competitive market look like, and what your customers value

  • Look for misalignment between current packaging and usage (e.g. oversold or undersold tiers, underpriced premium features) 

• Mock up pricing pages showing:

  • Clear tiering or modules

  • A value metric (even if you’re not charging on it yet)

  • Price points that align with perceived value

  • Success metrics: what would signal this is working?

⚖️ Validate hypothesis

• Test reactions through lightweight, practical methods:

  • Sales pilots: Use mock pricing pages in live calls, watch where prospects push back or hesitate

  • Customer interviews: Ask which pricing option best reflects delivered value, not “what they’d pay”

  • LLM analysis: Summarize qualitative feedback across teams to identify consistent themes

  • Internal roleplay: Pressure-test messaging with the team—if it can’t be explained internally, customers won’t get it either

• Adjust test based on product, price point, and number of existing customers—there is no universal strategy

2 traps to avoid

🚨 Validating through large-scale surveys instead of existing customers

• Early-stage teams often lack volume to make traditional large-scale surveys worth the cost and get meaningful results

• Start small with existing base of customers—especially for feedback on pricing packages, feature value, or early reactions to pricing

• Market panels help when targeting new segments or when there is a lack of customers, but is costly ($50-120 per response)

🚨 Ignoring pricing ops

• Picking the “right” pricing model is pointless if billing and packaging systems aren’t flexible enough to implement it

• Ensure your systems do not lock you into a rigid structure that can’t evolve as your product does

1 tool to leverage

📖 Best practice on validating hypothesis

• Customer interviews and small-scale surveys are grounded in real context and often enough to get you to 80% confidence. 

• For quantitative surveys, segment your data by business type or persona, group by 30+ responses where possible. 

• Summarize and visualize the data with tools like Claude or ChatGPT

Bonus: 1 trend to spark startup ideas

📈  Death of the billable hour model

• Law firms spend 45-50% of revenue on overhead costs; attorneys waste 40% of their time on non-legal tasks

• 70% of firms haven't adopted AI, and legal tech spending of $27B barely scratches the $900B+ legal services market

• Traditional law services are built on time scarcity where hours billed = value delivered 

• AI is breaking this model:

  • Repeatable tasks make up 30–60% of billable hours and can be compressed 50–90%

  • Lowering cost and removing market boundaries created by traditional pricing models that were serving complex, high-stakes matters

• Opportunities for AI-native legal startups:

  • AI tools for incumbents: Optimize workflows, but adoption ceilings limit venture-scale upside

  • AI-native law firms: AI handles 80-90% of the work and humans focus on strategy, client relationships, and complex judgment calls. Examples: M&A diligence platforms, compliance-as-a-service, vertical-specific contract lifecycle firms

  • Hybrid service-data platforms: Collect proprietary datasets from client work and monetize insights. Examples: Patent intelligence subscriptions, anonymized contract benchmarks, litigation outcome prediction engines